Irvine could have been champion and Prost the greatest
F1 2010 | Saturday 20 March 2010 by Richard BlayneyMy latest issue of F1 Racing dropped through my letterbox just the other day and I’ve started leafing through it to try get through as much of their pre-season guide as possible given that one race has already taken place. Living in Canada means the magazine reaches me from the UK a little later than I’d prefer and so some stories are a little out of date sometimes. Anyway, one short story that jumped out at me was with regards to the new points scoring system and I was amazed at how many times the outcome of past World Championships would have changed under the new system.
Eddie Irvine would have been 1999 world champion under the 2010 points system and if the new 25-18-15-12-8-6-4-2-1 scoring system had been in place since 1950, Alain Prost would have won seven world titles, Michael Schumacher only six and James Hunt wouldn’t have been champion at all.
— F1 Racing, March 2010
Take a look:
1964: Graham Hill champion, not John Surtees
1965: Graham Hill champion, not Jim Clark
1976: Niki Lauda champion, not James Hunt
1981: Carlos Reutemann champion, not Nelson Piquet
1983: Alain Prost champion, not Nelson Piquet
1984: Alain Prost champion, not Niki Lauda
1988: Alain Prost champion, not Ayrton Senna
1994: Damon Hill champion, not Michael Schumacher
1999: Eddie Irvine champion, not Mika Hakkinen
Now I’m sure Alain Prost is sitting at home thinking “what if,” while Nelson Piquet would likely be against these current changes due to what it would have done to his career!
............................................................................................................................................................................